Existential Ennui

~ Searching for Meaning Amid the Chaos

Existential Ennui

Monthly Archives: June 2010

What’s Up? 06/30/10

30 Wednesday Jun 2010

Posted by Sherry in Essays, Geology, GOP, Judiciary, LifeStyle, Psychology, Sarah Palin, SCOTUS, Sociology, teabaggers, Uncategorized, What's Up?

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Elena Kagan, GOP, Rand Paul, right wing nuttery, Sarah Palin, SCOTUS, temptations, Thurgood Marshall, will power

I don’t know about you, but opening my reader each day is like opening a Christmas present. I hope for something fantastic, and am usually happily rewarded. Here and there I get a piece of coal-a day where nobody is saying anything interesting to me.

But that seldom happens, and on a glorious day such as today with the sun shining brightly, the birds singing with exuberance, and the breeze so gentle as a adolescent kiss, I open it with anticipation.

Let’s see what we find!

I heard about this days ago. Mostly it was about the open mike and the audience members who made fun of  Sarah (that woman is an idiot) Palinator’s lack of ummm intelligence? But, speaking to a California college assembly (why in God’s earth would anyone invite her?), she gaffed as only our Sarah could. Sarah has a penchant for hiring old high school buds (equally stupid as herself, which goes without saying. Apparently one is her FACT checker.

The lunacy continues with Rand Paul refusing to answer how old the earth is. By refusing of course, he admits that he is crazy as a mop head. Rand, my man, we don’t care if you are off by even a few million  years, reasonable minds may differ. But if you refuse, we suspect you are off by a few billion, and that my dizzy friend makes you a no brainer. Unless of course you are merely trying to fake your way into gaining support from people you don’t really agree with. Sorta like you faked a board certification?

I’m feeling a trip to Washington as in DC is in order. Those GOP senators who are “interrogating” Elena Kagan must be in need of more bullets to shoot themselves in the foot. The constant barrage of “Justice Thurgood Marshall was not a proper judge” at Kagan who clerked for him, is suicidal at best. Well, a worst it is still suicidal. Apparently there will be a sign at all future voting booths–only white people can vote for Republicans. All else, vote for the Dems. I will take that as a good thing.

Temptation! Yikes. We all face it, whether it be food, drugs, booze, men, women, gambling. Whatever the thing that calls to you, beckons with seductive winking, luring you into danger, well we all face it or them. Balance in Me has some good ideas for meeting and beating your temptations.

Enjoy the day and see ya!

Bookmark and Share

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Optimistic Lie

30 Wednesday Jun 2010

Posted by Sherry in Editorials, Environment, God, Inspirational, Jesus, poverty, religion, social concerns, Sociology, Technology, theology

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

American optimism, environment, Jesus, sociology, Technology, the cross, theology, triumphalism, world economies

I’ve been pondering an idea from a couple of days ago that I read. Sooner or later it matures into something that warrants my setting it down.

I’m currently reading a book for review on Christology. A theologian, new to me, Douglas John Hall, said something I account very true.

He suggested that Canadians (he being one) and Americans, share a common cultural evil–a culture of optimism. It is not so by default, he argues, but is carefully groomed and maintained.

If you think about it, you will probably agree. I recall my civics classes in high school quite well. My overriding “feeling” about the entire learning process, was one of optimism. Americans somehow always get ‘er done, always find the solution, always win. We are the technological giants of the world. We set the standard.

The destruction of native peoples is mentioned, but glossed over in favor of an ideology that we were a big people with big ideas, the adventurous cream of the European crop, destined for big things. We NEEDED a big land. And along with that is a concomitant not stated but thoroughly impressed notion, that the end (which has been glorious) justified the means, (near annihilation of a people).

One of the impediments to our earlier release of our grip on Southeast Asia and the disastrous Vietnam war, was the lie that we had “never lost a war.” Draws don’t count, and the South would be what in the Civil war? We had great designs on much of Canada and we, nobly? gave them up? We ultimately told the big lie in Vietnam, a voluntary withdrawal is not losing. Yeah, but it was, and everyone knows it.

I recall some years ago, listening to a Amway pep talk on tape. “Don’t worry about the depletion and final end of oil, the speaker claimed. Americans ALWAYS find another way to accomplish. Never worry about scarcity, we always solve a problem.”

Thus do we perpetrate the unsaid real lesson–we are entitled to live as we wish, as comfortably, and as elegantly as money can buy, because when resources are gone, we will discover new ones. World–not to worry–America is in charge and will save you–or at least keep you at subsistence level where you are now–if only to preserve our largess.

Hall argues that in doing this we mask something that is part of the human experience–anxiety, limits, loneliness and temptations. We refuse these items on the menu if you will. We choose entertainment, more toys, and pseudo-intellectual pursuits–gallery openings and charity balls. We refuse to do with less, we find ways to stretch a dollar and fake high-class decorating on a dime instead.

Our presidents, no matter how dire the circumstances are sure to include a statement that they have no fear of America’s ultimate victory. Never never panic the little people with pessimistic predictions. Only do that when offset by the solution you KNOW will work–just vote for me!

Yet, it seems, we aren’t truly buying the optimism any more. Increasingly, as we try to figure out why so many hate and revile us, how our hard work is no longer reflected in our stock portfolios, and we face what seemed unimaginable only 50 years ago, namely we are the first generation not to significantly out-pace our parents, we are left with a vague unease, that something is amiss.

We are more prone to feeling that we toil for nothing. Yet will continue, Hall argues, to fly too near the sun, grasping at more, knowing somewhere inside that by doing so we deprive even more of the world’s poor. We know no other way he claims.

And his answer, in part, at least, is that churches need to be harbingers of a new way of seeing life–one that is not tied as he puts it to triumphalism. It is one that ties us back to the cross of Jesus.

We are, if I read him right, caught in a mode of human victory over every obstacle. We are much like the child who masters tying his shoes, and thus is ready to conquer the world. We are aided by the atheist who tells us that nothing surpasses the human mind, and everything we have is wrought from its inner recesses.

Some few of us, some few millions, are getting it, finally. We humbly confess our near ruination of this planet in every respect. Watching Blood Diamonds last night, I’m reminded of a main character who has struggled to regain his family torn by revolution, murder and mayhem. He says, “I get that the white man would do this to us for the diamonds. What I do not get is how my own people could do this to each other.”

We have done this to each other and to ourselves. We may be past the point of fixing it. And I am convinced, we will not fix it without finding the humility to express our evil wrongs and to do our penance in however we might view that. By prayer, by learning to live simply, by accepting that different does not mean not as good.

I do not embrace pessimism. On the contrary, in dismantling the optimistic lie, I live in faith and hope that we as a species will, with out extraordinary minds, gifted by God, turn and see the truth, and save ourselves and all that lives.

If we do not, then, God will weep for his lost planet, and will look on in his universe to other more successful life evolutions. And we, spiritual souls that we are, will have learned a grave lesson as we journey on with God. But it will be sad will it not?

Bookmark and Share

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

What’s Up? 06/29/10

29 Tuesday Jun 2010

Posted by Sherry in Essays, Human Biology, Judiciary, Psychology, SCOTUS, What's Up?

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Congress, day dreaming, Elena Kagan, Human Biology, psychology, SCOTUS

I’ve been reading Dorothy Parker the last few weeks. Enjoying short snippets of short stories, poetry, and some of her book and play reviews.

Especially as to her reviews, she was wont to do a lot of (dontcha just love this?) parenthetical asides like I just did there. I recognized it right away, since I do a whole lot of them. Usually and especially when I’m being witty.

I am being witty, in case you weren’t sufficiently IQish enough to notice. Anyway, it struck me that I might be channelling Dot, since I swear I was doing it before I learned that she did it.

That is problematical since she died in 1967, when I was 17, so it can’t fairly be said that she reincarnated in little ole me. Which I would have liked mind you. But perhaps she looked around and slipped her little shadowy ghostly self in me a little, just like sprinkling a bit of pixie dust as she floated ever upward. If so, she knew me better than I know myself.

I have watched a bit of the Kagan confirmation and she’s making the right wing GOP look silly. That’s unbiased I assure you. If you want to read what the really really really wacko crazies are sayin’ bout the soon to be Associate Justice, then go here, and find out that she signals in her own person, evidence of the END TIMES. Scary. I’m getting ready to be twinkled up!

If you would like a really excellent treatment of the history of confirmation by the Senate, then Meredith Hindley has a fine article at the Humanties, which takes a look at the entire issue of when and why the Congress get involved in the type of hearings we have today.

I don’t believe in coincidences a lot. I think that when we are open, we “see” connections, we draw them to us, or more technically, our true Spirit does. So it doesn’t surprise me after yabbering about dreaming and my preference, day dreaming, there should be a neat article in the NYTimes about the values of day dreaming. Freud be damned, as I said. I told ya, you can always count on me to be right. You heard that from the horses mouth. (Psst, I’m not sure what that is, since, I’ve not met a talking horse, AND since I am suspicious that Mr. Ed was not REAL in that sense.)

Well, I have volunteer stuff today, and some errands to run, so I must scoot. Have a fabulous day, and we’ll be back tomorrow with more good stuff.

Bookmark and Share

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

I LOVE SPONTANEITY!!#&!#

29 Tuesday Jun 2010

Posted by Sherry in Essays, Humor, Overlooking the Fields, Psychology, Satire, Sociology

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Humor, psychology, routine, satire, spontaneity

Speaking of psychology. (You must keep up! We discussed this yesterday regarding dreaming!)

Actually, I am not here to pick on psychology. I think it tries hard to help people who are anywhere from deranged to mildly anxious, and counselors, psychiatrists and all other manner of therapists, help plenty of folks and allay their suffering.

That said, most of it is a bunch of bunk!  (just kiddin’ there) But I do claim that for a lot of individuals, they work it out in time by themselves. And clearly not every manner of treatment works for each and every person.

That said, I figure I use this blog as my couch. Which causes me some concern since it’s like being naked before a stranger in a super market or being naked in front of a stranger (a doctor) in a clinic. You know, one is sensible, the other slightly creepy. I don’t know as I want to let you in on all my foibles and weirdnesses. Mores to the point, some of you are either versed in the subject matter or will look up “symptoms” and know more about me that I know about myself.

That said, (I’m stuck on that phrase it seems) I am not a spontaneous person. There I said it. I don’t like not knowing what I’m going to do in the next hour or the next half day, or for that matter, I pretty much like to know the basics of my week.

I don’t like surprises. I don’t like to improvise, fly by the seat of my pants, throw caution to the wind, play it by ear, being devil may care,  or any of those common fun sounding methodologies for living life. I don’t fly anywhere having no idea where I might stay. Preparation is a virtue!

People who like to be spontaneous, I submit, are really just hair-brained, lazy, procrastinators, who get caught with things to do, and no plan to do them, and time running out. They call this being spontaneous. I call it being rude. Or worse.

I do admit, that there are folks who are just made for spur of the moment fun. The type that just say, “throw a bag in the car, road trip!” I am the sensible one who recalls that there is a dental appointment on Thursday, and who will water the garden, and the laundry hasn’t been done. They are irresponsible immature dopes and shouldn’t be allowed to procreate.

For, in case you didn’t know, there ARE rules to life. Actual, tried and true rules. Remember that commercial years ago that Wednesday was  “Prince’s spaghetti day?” Of course. They understood the rules.

Now, I’m spontaneous enough to know that Wednesday doesn’t have to be YOUR spaghetti day, it may be Thursday, or even more daring, Monday! But laundry is meant to be done on the same day or days every week. That just makes sense. Otherwise the fresh sheets and the cleaning of the bathroom get all screwed up. And that then screws up the shopping day. And shopping days are very very important.

Shopping should be done on any day but Friday or Saturday. Everyone knows that. No spontaneous shopping on those days, cuz all the violators are there on those days, and who wants to hang out with LOSERS? People who can’t get the rules? They probably have other unsavory habits that you are better off not knowing about too. Don’t test your luck! Don’t shop on those days.

Worst of all, is when you have to have your routine intersect with someone else’s routine, and they are not good rule followers. When we have a plan, I make other plans. So if you willy-nilly change the routine, you upset God knows how many other plans, that are connected to God knows how many other tendrils of the tapestry of my life. You start everything unraveling, and before you know it, you have created a rip in the very texture of the space-time continuum.

This is dangerous to us all as you can see. Routines are good. Not like greed it good, because greed is not really good at all, but routines are. Trust me. Routines allow the mind to wander, and this is necessary if we are to think of new things. If we are having to concentrate in the uncharted waters of spontaneity, why, I daresay, Jefferson would have never gotten around the that Declaration thingie (channeling Sarah, come in Sarah!). And Henry would have never thought up the assembly line. And where would we be then? I ask ya?

Routines are what make cheerleaders actually lead rather than just look silly jumping up and down alone. They are what make pairs figure skating something more than an adventure in bumper car chaos. You get my drift I hope.

Spontaneity is okay in it’s place. It is essential if your plane goes down in the Amazon jungle and you need to fashion a SOS sign above the tree canopy with only a lipstick, a banana, and a sewing kit. (That could be ingenuity, but I think spontaneity works too.) You see my point assuredly?

So, if you don’t mind, when your plans are my plans, don’t be thinking of changing them at the last minute, unless a life is at stake. I get might snarky at having everything upended. I worry about the balance of nature, and other esoteric metaphysical things like that, cuz somebody has to.

And, you know me, I always take my responsibilities seriously.

Bookmark and Share

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Design Flaw Discovered: Fix it God!

28 Monday Jun 2010

Posted by Sherry in Essays, Evolution, God, Human Biology, Humor, Psychology

≈ 10 Comments

Tags

analysis, brain physiology, dreams, God, Johnny Depp, psychology

I don’t know about you, but I figure on my top ten list of questions to ask God, is “what is all this dream crap about?”

I mean really. What is the point? I know all the bull hockey pucky about “working out subconscious blah blah junk” while blissfully asleep. Yada Yada. Psychological gibberish.

I have yet to have a dream that illuminated anything for me, other than that I would rather just not have them. Freud be damned, full speed ahead. (oops, torpedoes?)

My dreams suck. Always have. And I have dream patterns. And they suck worse. Always have.

Okay, I used to have a dream where I was endangered by a bull, and couldn’t walk, and could only crawl literally by pulling myself along by my fingertips. I still have them, although there is no observable danger, but I’m trying to go fast, and I’m walking through glue. Frustrating.

Another is  waking up late and I’m late for a final exam that I haven’t studied for, and when I’m walking down the hall, I’m increasingly naked. Oh and my teeth often fall out. (I don’t have that one much any more, since I got pretty stern with my self (inside self) demanding a cessation when I’m not in FREAKIN’ school any more!

Every sex dream I’ve ever had has always been in the end frustrated. Now what’s that all about? It’s particularly bad when the man in question is a hot throbbing entertainment figure. We are always interrupted by somebody just as things are getting good, and we can never find a place of solitude after that.

Johnny Depp is NEVER in my dreams, and that sucks.

My most curious dream is where I lose my car in some parking lot, and when I finally find it, realize I’ve left my purse somewhere and I try to hurry back to find it, and of course, the glue again.

Or, as I’m heading for a destination, all the sudden things get more and more complicated and I lose my way, and I’m going through buildings and can’t find exits. And then I gotta pee, and I find a bathroom, which is a mess, but I go, but before I even get out the door, I gotta pee again. And again. And again.

You can figure this one out. Even I can, and I do, and I wake up, and I scurry to the bathroom, and well, that is about as prophetic a dream as I can get.

No Abraham “here I am” from me. No dreams of  mystical revelation for this kiddo, no siree.

There are no lovely grass shacks on to-die-for tropical islands, no perfect bikini body for me, no Adonis in a thong to swoon for, no president asking me, “Sherry, I need you expertise on this one, the world is at stake!”

No, just frustration after frustration.

Worse, oh so much worse, are those barely recalled ones. The ones that in the first instance of consciousness you recall, but it slips away so fast that all you are left with is an uneasiness that you can’t identify but something was going wrong in that dream. You were sad, or vaguely scared, or outraged, or witnessing the beginning of Armageddon? I don’t recall, as I said. Unsettling and I don’t like that!

A glass and a half of wine later, sitting in the living, and Ive finally managed to let go of the creepy feeling. I stumble off to bed at a nice 3 am, and hope to sleep.

Am I getting my point across? I don’t like dreams. Thank you very much, but NO THANK YOU. I can DAYdream and I do that very very well. I am fine with that.

I can reel out a floor plan for the perfect home on the perfect tropical island at a moment’s notice. I’ve got all that in here:*Shudder* perhaps that ‘s my problem! I’m channeling Bushboy.

But no, I have actual brain matter in my noggin’. And it works just fine, without all this subconsciousy psycho babble.

As far as I can see, the “other” me I meet in my dreams, bears little resemblance to me anyway. She’s addled if you ask me. She is forever forgettin’ stuff and has a body that doesn’t move well, and doesn’t get much pleasure. That’s not me!

The Contrarian, suffering from a “swimmer’s ear” this morning, thinks God was kinda loose with the design stuff. “I nice blow hole on the top of my head would have been a blessing,” he suggests. While I’m not sure of his design capabilities, the Contrarian’s that is,  I’ve certainly come to agree that all this dream nonsense is a waste of time and often sets a bad tone for the day.

He could easily have kept the dreams and given us a bit more grey matter. George Dubya would be the first to agree with that, if he could think that deeply, which he can’t so it’s all pretty much moot.

And I NEVER dream about Johnny Depp. And that is a CRIME doncha think? I mean, I’d be willing to rethink this whole issue, if. . . .

Bookmark and Share

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Plain Meaning?

27 Sunday Jun 2010

Posted by Sherry in Bible, Bible Essays, Editorials, fundamentalism, God, Inspirational, Jesus, Matthew, religion, social concerns

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

bible, ethics, Jesus, love, Matthew, violence

Today’s Gospel is Matthew 10:34-39. To those who are deeply trained in biblical scholarship and know the difficulties of interpretation, this passage brings shudders.

Shudders, because in the hands of those who believe that there is such a thing as “plain meaning” much evil can be wrought from it.

I had no desire to tackle this passage myself, but unfortunately apparently I am supposed to, since I read an article in a theological journal this morning on Christian ethics and integrity and authenticity, and, well, this passage simply makes the point so well.

So you see, I really had no choice. I’m learning that being hit over the head once is sufficient, thanks be to God!

If we are to live an ethical life, the writer argues, then consistency is called for. He claims a couple of ways of looking at it. First there is the “purity” paradigm wherein the person claims a dominate value (loving God) and subsumes all of life’s decisions to it. The other is called the integrity paradigm and reflects a coherence among all life’s capacities and needs coming to unity in a richness of existence. ¹

It is a bit technical but what I think the author gets at is the idea that we can become quite rigid under the purity paradigm. We get caught up defining what constitutes proper “love of God” by how ever we interpret that to mean, and by what means we use to determine it. Biblical literalists would obviously see it differently than a social justice progressive.

Along comes Jesus, telling us that:

Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword.

We are headed for trouble here. The literalist can easily in his “plain meaning” mode, suggest that Jesus here endorses violence to attain the ends he promotes. Certainly those demented souls who shoot doctors who perform abortions, so read the passage. Loving God means upholding their interpretation of what God wants. They must wield the sword.

But as we say again and again, context is everything here. First of all, read the entire chapter. If you do, you will see that Jesus is telling his disciples what they will encounter in spreading the message. He sends them out to do good words and to preach the message of love, hope and repentence. But he warns them that they will not always be met with friendship and welcoming.

The Word is a sword, calling forth extraordinary effort that some are unwilling to make. To these the disciples are admonished to leave those towns “shaking the dust from your sandals.” They are not told to beat unbelievers into submission or to stone them. Hardly are they told to take up sword against them.

No, Jesus, merely reminds them that the Gospel message, though one of hope and joy is also a difficult one to live by, and there are powers who will find it in opposition to their lives of greed and priviledge.

So difficult is this, that entire households will be split between those that will come unto them and those that won’t. They are not to fear, for God is with them and will protect them.

If indeed families split over his teachings, then let it be so. For love of God does comes first, or should. But indeed, remember, it is following Jesus that is the way to show that love of God. And Jesus message is always about healing, forgiveness, love, and hope. There are simply too many references to Jesus’ admonishment of violence as not the “way” to think otherwise.

When Jesus says at the end,

Those who find their life will lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake will find it.

he does not speak, in my opinion of martyrdom so much as he tells us that we only think we have life. Until we are willing to risk all for love and justice and our neighbor, we have no real life, only a shadow ephemeral life. When we are willing to set that aside, and offer our lives fully to other, then we will finally gain our real life in God.

The cross is not suffering on behalf of Jesus or God. Rather it is the willingness to actuate love in all circumstances, regardless of consequences. We find love at the center of all things. We support and congratulate love. We celebrate it in each other without reference to status, gender, orientation, or any other human thing. For God made all to his good desire.

That is the sword–the sword of radical love-that will one day be beat into a plowshare when all bend the knee of the heart and confess that God is where we each and every one of us move and have our being.

Amen.

———

Footnote

1. Schweiker, William, Consistency and Christian Ethics, The Anglican Theological Review, Vol. 90, #3, Summer 2008, pg. 567.

Bookmark and Share

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Resting the Noggin

26 Saturday Jun 2010

Posted by Sherry in Democrats, Editorials, GOP, Media, Sociology

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

bias, evaluating the media, Media, news, truth

I’ve been thinking again. I know, I know, dangerous stuff.

In a few months I’ll be facilitating a discussion on evaluating information, more specifically, how to judge the bias of that which we use as sources of information.

Let’s face it, our ancestors had a much easier time of this, though they may not have been better informed. We are reminded that most towns didn’t get unbiased “news” but the opinion of the publisher–usually the opinions of two publishers with rather different takes on the same issue.

If you don’t believe me, stop by your library sometimes and go to the big city papers, say during the Civil War era. I can tell you, there is no “fair” reporting. In fact, the attacks and counter-attacks were so vicious, that we nearly faint at what we read, shaking our head.

Yet many (nearly most I guess now in the boomer generation) grew up on the likes of Huntley-Brinkley, and the most trusted man in news, Walter Cronkite. We expect truth from the news, and alas, all that has changed once again. Whether by design as in Foxy News, or because we just don’t get how to filter our own feelings, like most of the mainstream services, we seldom get objective facts.

We may get facts, but they are filtered, and chosen from a long list of facts. Case in point. The Republicans have been holding up the unemployment compensation bill for weeks now, and millions of fairly desperate people are soon to have NOTHING to even buy food with. A few bluedog Dems are also in the mix, but mostly it’s a GOP thing.

The GOP claims that it is being fiscally responsible (after eight years of being spendthrifts), but in reality they are using that excuse as but a means to try to keep Obama from showing any legislative success on ANYTHING. You would think that people who are scared silly about putting food on the table would be outraged at Republicans?

Depends on where you get your news. If from MSNBC, the you are properly outraged, because it is solely the fault of the GOP and their evil pouty desire to stick it to Obama and their callus lack of caring for the average Joe. If from ABC, well you get the story differently “Congress” is being fiscally responsible, and “cannot” fund bills unless money is cut from something else. NO mention that this is factually a Republican thing at all.

The news is just all wacky these days, at least from my prospective. David Brooks commiserates with Gen. Stanley McChrystal, suggesting that he just forgot that we now live in a climate of “gotcha” news. There is no “off the record”  or as he calls it kvetching, allowed anymore. It ends up in print. McChrystal, as he sees it, did no more or less than every politico in Washington does–try to make himself/herself look important vis-a-vis the other power centers around them.

He doesn’t see the “culture of exposure,” as he terms it, as a good thing. He might be right. Did we get better government when reporters delicately turned a deaf ear and eye to President Kennedy’s liaisons? I dunno.

I can tell ya something is awry when polling suggests that Jon Stewart is the most trusted speaker of truth in the world of politics. I mean really! And yet, I admit that I trust Jon and Stephen more than I do most anyone else. I love Keith, but I know he goes over the top and suffers from “damn how does Fox do it when they obviously LIE all the time?” syndrome.

We’re all being asked, with little or no training, to evaluate these “truth” givers. In reality there are too many facts, and thus they must pick and choose. It becomes our burden to know all the other facts they are leaving out. By having some clue on this, perhaps we can discern whether they are mostly right or mostly wrong, from our point of view.

For make no mistake, our point of view is no more free from bias than any of them. We read and watch what reverberates in our own little hearts you can be sure. But as always, I hammer away, we have duties here people.

Duties to read as many voices as possible. And duties to attempt to learn the trade of seeking the danger signals along the way. Use of words like “some” and “many” instead of actual linkable facts, suggests that the writer is either lazy or attempting to turn a minority opinion into something more palatable to the unwary.

Baby boomers can recall that the media made the switch during the Vietnam War from calling the opposition “war protesters” to “peace marchers.” That signaled that the mainline media reps were no longer on the side of Johnson and his administration. The questions changed, got harder, and Johnson suddenly found himself standing alone with an unwinnable war that nobody supported any more.

Being bombarded by so much these days through cable, mainstream media, and especially the Internet, leaves us all shell shocked.  It also leaves one in a perpetual state of high anger if you actually care about people and the world (something verifiable psychologically about Dems). It’s why frankly, I often don’t write on Sunday, unless it’s more light-hearted and away from the political scene.

Quite frankly, I find I need more than one day away from all the stonewalling misinformation, and ad hominem assaults that each side now find more profitable than actual facts. I don’t want to be angry all the time.

So what tricks do you use to evaluate all this stuff? Who to read and listen to? How to maintain some semblance of objective accuracy in your understanding of the issues of the day? I’d be interested to know.

Bookmark and Share

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

Who We Are

Thinking non-stop since April 15, 1950. We search for meaning amid the chaos.

Giggles

Laugh as Long as You Can

Subscribe

Subscribe in a reader

Donations Joyfully Accepted

Calendar

June 2010
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« May   Jul »

Follow Me!

Follow afeatheradrift on Twitter

Facebook

Sherry Peyton
Sherry Peyton
Create Your Badge

Words of Wisdom

The work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives and the dream shall never die. ~~Sen. Edward M. Kennedy~~

Recent Posts

  • We moved to Blogger
  • Moving to Blogger
  • Christianist Doublespeak
  • Next Week I’m Gonna Start Biting People
  • Time to Report for Retirement
  • The Best Little Whorehouse in Boulder? Or How I Loved to Learn Republicanese Gangsta Style
  • The Power of the Post
  • The Exceptionalism of the United States of America
  • Can We Stop With the Illegals Shit?
  • I Laughed, I Cried, I Spat Epithets, I Chewed the Rug
  • *Temporarily Asphyxiated With Stupid
  • Are You Having Trouble Hearing? Or is That Gum in Your Ear?
  • Collecting Dust Bunnies Among the Stars
  • Millennial Falcon Returning From Hyperbole
  • Opening a Box of Spiders

A Second Blog

  • Extraordinary Words
  • What's on the Stove?

History Sources

  • Encyclopedia Romana

The Subjects of My Interest

Drop the I Word

We Support OWS

Archives

The Hobo Jesus

Jesushobo With much thanks to Tim
Site Meter

Integrity

Twitter Updates

  • @realDonaldTrump #YOUREFIRED 2 years ago
  • Tales From the Pandemic acrazyladyblog.wordpress.com/2020/05/09/tal… 2 years ago
  • @MarshaBlackburn Stop the racism trumpish cultist 2 years ago
  • @realDonaldTrump NEVER you asshat. We await your removal via straight jacket and handcuffs. 4 years ago
  • Melanie says women's claim of sexual assault not suff evidence,. Women's voices minimized. She's as sick as tRump.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 years ago

World Visitors

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Existential Ennui
    • Join 2,453 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Existential Ennui
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: