I continue to believe that much that is wrong with higher education, and certainly of lower education, is our failure to teach and thus to learn, “how to think.”
You may think such a thing is self-evident, but I can assure it is not. For all creatures, with a sufficient brain, think in some sense–a dog thinks it’s hungry and walks to its food bowl, much as a fish does. When satiated, they stop.
However, humans, or at least higher life forms have greater capabilities, and can make decisions about events yet to come, assess long term benefits and pitfalls. We have the ability to think critically. And yet, few of us are taught this most important skill. Instead we are relegated, all too often, to the tried and true method of experimentation and learning from “our mistakes.” This is both time consuming and can be costly.
I have been a reader all my life, yet, I feel not particularly well read. I can name dozens of “classical” literature that I have not read. It was not stressed in my youth certainly–books (except for cheap dime store war novels) never graced our coffee table or night stands for that matter. I knew nothing of architecture, anthropology, french literature, or god forbid philosophy.
I did not secure a liberal arts education, where I might have bumped into some of these things. Trying to read, say Spinoza today is a bit like dropping into the middle of War and Peace and explaining the plot. I don’t get the language. A dozen other topics have left me cold in the same way–verbiage that I cannot penetrate no matter how hard I might try.
One is tempted to simply say, that I don’t have the IQ for it. And in fairness, that might be accurate. Maybe I could read Jergen Moltmann for years and never discern what the hell he is trying to tell me, because I just don’t have the brain power for it. I just don’t know, though I’ve devoted some significant thinking to the problem.
It matters. I am not comfortable with being average in intellect, I want to be part of that rarefied 1-2% of superior minds. I suspect I am not, and thus, I am perhaps wasting time.
As I said, part of it may be simply that you have to be in the club. Doctors can read all manner of stuff that we laypersons can’t fathom, because they have a secret language that only they know. Same for lawyers. I suspect the same thing is found in most of our disciplines.
Part is not existing in the social milieu where such material is discussed as a matter of course. We were working class folk, and though I was often teased for having my head in a book all too often, I was not dissuaded from my pursuit often. But then, I had no one to bounce these new ideas off of either.
Some things I read at too early an age, and simply didn’t have the background. Dropping into the middle of War and Peace again. I recall reading Kate Millet’s Sexual Politics in my late teens or very early 20′s and recall nothing memorable. I certainly wouldn’t have grasped much of Simone de Beauvior’s Second Sex I doubt. (Which by the way it is being re-issued in English in its entirety.)
All I know is that when I come upon something that I start to read, and it gets all existential and then tells me about ontological and teleological methodologies, I start to swoon, and not with love, but with nausea. We get to neo-Platonism before I have begun to digest Platonism, and then it goes off to Post-Modernism with hardly a chance to catch my breath. I hear about relativism from people who don’t frankly have a clue what they are talking about, but they have picked it up as a good sound bite from their talking points memo.
It starts to make my head hurt, then starts to make me feel stupid. And if there is one thing I don’t like to be, it is stupid. While it’s far better to know one is stupid and to keep quiet, it is still pretty bad to know that.
Having no really great talent, such as violin playing, or creating exotic desserts, I have to rely on something after all.
Which brings me back to critical thinking. Perhaps I can do that, at least well enough to know that I am not Einstein’s protege′ nor heir. I can’t write prose that draws on seven different disciplines including neuroscience, anthropology, analytical psychology and Elizabethan court literature. Nope, if you expected that, well sorry to say, it ain’t me.
Yet, I look adoringly upon those who can, for they just sound so dang smart. Maybe it’s all pretense. Maybe it’s all an inside joke and they and their peers know it’s all so much blather. But I doubt that. I truly do. And I wanna be part of the club.
Sadly I find that the older I get the less patience I have with “real” literature. When I was a kid I was able to read all kinds of stuff that now seems to dense for me. Not philosophy, but for instance I read “Lorna Doone” when I was about 13, an English novel that is about 2 inches thick and takes about 100 pages just to get going. Loved it. When I was in college I took an English Novel course and read a whole bunch of even longer and more wordy books. Middlemarch by George Eliot is over 900 pages long – I read it over spring break and thought it was great. Now I’m lucky if I get through a few mysteries!
lol Maui…I know what you mean. I’m thinking about reading Beauvoir “Second Sex” which is coming out with a new translation and in its entirety, and it’s near a thousand pages….
As a kid I loved the long novels because I read so fast. I probably read Little women in three days.
Yikes, “too” dense for me, not “to.”
Hi Sherry;
Life isn’t about “intelligence” or being well read.
Who can claim to know it all?
No one.
Einstein was gifted, not only about physics, but about life.
Yet, those are his thoughts. If we cannot understand him or anyone else who has perceived higher “intelligence”, what good is it?
I have heard and seen profound things from people who many would assume are “less than” ourselves in the intellect or morality department.
Critical thinking is apt for human behavior, although we rarely apply that to our own behavior but rather to our creature comforts and needs.
I see the time coming when the importance of how we act together as a species will be amplified, or as history proves, we will do it the hard way.
I saw the other blog entry you wrote and commented on it. You address issues many of us think about, that is a good thing.
Conclusions, those are for each and every one of us to discern, isn’t it?
Ichabod, I realize that life is not about being well read or intelligent–that is my prideful issue I fully accept that.
And to a degree I also admit that someone who is so lofty as not to be understood is not much of a communicator and perhaps is steeped themselves in some arrogance.
I have also witnessed on more than once occasion great ideas from the minds of those who are shall we say not so well endowed. I mean no disrepect in any manner to that.
I just often read lofty literary articles and have difficulty because they allude to other authors and principles that they seem to suggest “everyone” already understands and has read. But I have not, and feel shamed some how, and uneducated perhaps? This from someone who has a BA a JD and most of a MA. lol…go figure.
I’m not sure what other entry you commmented on. Did I respond? sometimes if there are too many, they don’t show up on my email or I get confused. Direct me to it if you wish, so I can read it.
Hi Sherry;
Yes you replied on are we Biblical or are we Selfish.
“I just often read lofty literary articles and have difficulty because they allude to other authors and principles that they seem to suggest “everyone” already understands and has read. But I have not, and feel shamed some how, and uneducated perhaps?” I know that feeling.
After a while it is futile. Ecclesiastes had a wonderful line for this, “of making many books there is no end; and much study is a weariness of the flesh”
Now when you consider this was supposedly written before Christ’s time, you have to wonder what kind of printing presses they had back then.
I am ignorant and I am not ashamed to admit it. I never graduated from high school and failed my grade 9 English.
I don’t even know how to properly structure a sentence never mind reading Dante’s Enferno, although I liked Herman Hesse’s Siddhartha and Steppenwolf.
There is too much knowledge out there. How much of it is true or relevant?
The truth and relevance portion I am extremely interested in and yet, there is so much we do not know and maybe it is not for us to know.
End the end, all we can do is be who we can be.
One small thing I have learned well, is that education is exactly NO barometer of intelligence. My husband told me of a young lad he met who had quit school and at age 16 or so had taken off on his own to learn of the world. He read what he wanted and was, as my husband said, probably the smarted person he has ever met.
I suspect a bit less reading and a bit more thinking would do me a world of good. Thanks for raising some really excellent points.
Sherry, being a generalist in a specialized world is rough. When I worked as the senior executive recruiter for a large market research firm, my job was to qualify and recruit top executives for compensated research. In the process, I had to learn the enough to the jargons to communicate within a wide variety of fields. That skill has proved most useful, because if I don’t understand something, I know how to find out.
I agree that our education system has moved away from teaching how to think. It had been replaced by teaching what to think. It was not that way when I graduated from high school 44 years ago. That saddens me.
I have been in love with learning all my life. Perhaps the wisest thing I have learned is the the more I learn, the more I appreciate the extreme magnitude of that which I do not know.
Oh Tom, indeed that is the rub. The more I learn, the more I realize what I don’t know, and the list grows longer! lol…
For your sake, may the list become infinite.
Hi Sherry,
Almost every person has at least one real talent they should be able to discover and cultivate; having read your writing for awhile now, I have no doubt you have more than one.
But I know the “dumb” feeling you’re talking about, especially the one generated by philosophers. I had a philosophy professor who was enamored with a philosopher named Ninian Smart, (yeah, I know) who mad his hay creating secular philosophy of religion methodologies. In other more normal words, he turn the study of religion into a sterile intellectual turd hunt.
Those were also the days I was making my first pass through The Urantia Book, so I was more than a little pissed at the way academia was choosing to approach the study of religion and especially cosmology.
As you may know, the UB has it’s own level of intimidating intellectual prowess. I can remember feeling pretty f’n smart getting all the way through it, only to encounter a wonderful older woman at a study group that same summer who had read the UB seven times; and she had the full mental power of a third grade education to help her through it.
Knowledge, it turns out, is an eternal quest. We will never stop learning as we travel through eternity exploring God, because we can never arrive at the full knowledge of absolute truth; that territory belongs to the Infinite Mind of God alone.
But there are other crucial areas we can quest for as humans besides knowledge— like moral values; spiritual values; and personality values— the ability to recognize the reality of God as a personality, and the converging realization of our real relationship with all other personalities. In layman’s terms, that’s simply the Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of all mankind.
Now, the “art of wisdom”? As a wisening older artist, I’ve been humbled to learn I’ve spent most of my life just learning how to think! Someday I hope I might actually learn to really live the golden rule; now that’s surely the art of wisdom, no?
Michael, one of the most lovely ideas I’ve gained from UB is the expanse of time to go forward in growth. That is perhaps the most exciting part to me. I confess, I’ve never managed getting through it all, yet, I’ve read well more than half and continue to read from it and learn marvelous new ways of seeing life and God. I thank you ever for introducing me.
I agree that sometimes we get caught up in the facts instead of the truly compelling insights into our own an other’s values and ethics. I’m notorious about scholarly investigation of the bible, forgetting sometimes that there are really really important theological implications which get shortchanged in the process.
Often it is really all about coming to learn the language being used. It seems each system of thought has it’s own language. I never took a single philosophy class and found theology to be a bit of challenge. But some systematic theologians were easier for me to grasp than others, even as I rarely ever understood a philosopher except kierkegard…I found the same thing to be true in my social work classes – took awhile to learn the language that psychiatric theorists were using. Again, I found some easier than others. Mostly thought I was grateful to have a seminary professor who knew Moltmann and basicaly interpreted him for us. That said, I am just a person of basic ordinary intellect – who has always been convinced that if only I knew how to think I’d figure more stuff out.
Terri, I agree. There are some theologians I can get and others that basically sound like greek to me. Rahner is one that I find nearly non-intellible. Perhaps its the translations from German that somehow don’t work so well. I don’t know. But I’m glad I’m not alone! I also found Kierkegard much more understandable.
Experience shows that the greatest wisdoms and best observations are by those who think they are not intelligent or educated.
It takes particular smarts to get a JD with almost an MA.
lol…as to the JD Tony, it takes determination, rather than much in the way of smarts I think. Being a good lawyer and being a good law student are vastly different animals. In law school, you just have to grit it out. I agree that I did learn volumes in my Masters program, where critical thinking was emphasized. First place I really learned that.
great post.
our education system – where does one start. teachers – too harried and too worried about bureacracy. the best dont want to teach because it doesnt pay enough. now instead of funding education we fund wars. kids are too overwhelmed by “who did i see” or the newest MP3 to worry about reading “To Kill A Mockingbird” or Dickens. (I hate dickens and shakespeare, but boy am I glad i read them). and now school boards like in Texas wanting to rewrite history to indoctrinate.
there is no doubt the next generation of leaders will be incapable of leading and forging ahead – this group sure cant
DC, I truly worry what will become of the next generation. Texas and others seem to unknowingly want to hand this country over to the Chinese or whomever. This kind of utterly faulty knowledge will be disasterous. We cannot learn from our mistakes if we don’t learn what they are. It’s sickening.
Ain’t it weird. I love both Dickens and Shakespeare. Brilliant minds don’t always have to think alike it seems. LOL…