This is a photo by Annie Liebowitz, of a Pasadena ball player. No date. She doesn’t throw like any girl does she?
To everyone who has expressed concern and interest in our plight in Iowa. The river has yet to crest in Cedar Rapids, but no more rain is predicted at least until probably Sunday, and then it looks like clear skies for nearly a week at least. I’ve not heard regarding Troy yet. Those in the flood plain will undoubtedly be hit, but they have had nearly a week’s warning to get ready. Of course that is small consolation but most things can be saved at least.
We suffered probably an additional 4-5 inches of rain yesterday with storm after storm going through. The pump was running probably a good 30 minutes out of every hour to keep up. It’s much improved today, we can run it perhaps 5-10 minutes per hour at best to keep it down. It’s hard to say about the garden of course. If needs be, we will plow it under and replant and hope that there is still enough time for most crops. I suspect there will be.
Emotionally it certainly takes it toll. The unrelenting storm after storm was tough. Today, its the unrelenting coverage by every channel, repeating the same stuff again and again, running the same footage. There is a certain type of person who gets a thrill from this kind of thing, broadcasters and volunteers are no exception, they just love to be center stage and feel that they are important. Very little new is added, very little new needs to be disseminated. Those in peril are most aware. Mostly I want to think about just about anything else but this flood. Thanks so much for all your concern! I am still shocked that local news doesn’t even mention the tornado and loss of life by 4 young boys in western Iowa. It’s rather crass in my opinion.
So lets finish up the weeks with some political news and see what else is going on in the world.
~~~&&&~~~&&&~~~
Many have no doubt heard that the SCOTUS has scored a big one against the Bushites. Much to their chagrin no doubt, SCOTUS concluded that Gitmo detainees have the right of habeas corpusin the federal courts of the US. I laughed mightily as the usual pundits of FOXNEWSLESS, floundered in horror at the effrontery of the Court to reject the work of two other branches of government as if this was unheard of. Guess they have forgotten their own rhetoric regarding abortion and a slew of other issues. What the non-lawyers fail to realize is that personal self interest creeps into these decisions whether understood or not. Justices do actually look at issues in terms of “could this be applied to me under certain circumstances?” If the answer is yes, they are likely to strike it down. Endless detention without recourse can of course be applied to anyone in a distant scenario that can easily be concocted by the mind. So, the Court is a bit more likely to not give government that kind of extreme power.
If you can believe this one, Veterans Affairs lawyers try to tell the Federal Appeals Court that helping foster voter registration among veterans in their facilities is “partisan.” I mean sure its partisan, it’s partisan to try to prevent it, since prevention of registration plays into Republican hands. What a joke. I’ve had the dubious honor of attempting to making an argument before judge and jury while trying to keep a straight face. Believe me, it ain’t easy.
Once again, as we have reported,Bush is using the rhetoric of war vis a vis Iran.As Jon Stewart pointed out last night and as Bill Moyers pointed out last week, he’s even using the same exact wording in his threats to Iran that he used to Iraq and Hussein. The media, now given a chance to redeem themselves and push the hard questions, is doing the same as usual, holding its breath and nodding in agreement.
Two websites you might way to keep bookmarked to use as a resource tool. One is Obama generated to fight the usual GOP swiftboating tactics and is called Fight the Smears. Another is run by the DNC and is to debunk McBushite misleads and is calledMcCainpedia. Whenever you hear something that sounds questionable, run by and test it through these sites. Do you realize that still fully 10% of folks claim that Obama is Muslim? The links can be found at the third entry in Blue Girl, Red State’s nightowl wrapup.
To say that Obama’s speech to AIPAC was not well received by the Arab worldgoes without saying. Many were thoroughly distressed and saddened by his severe pro-Israeli stand, especially as it relates to Jerusalem, the one city Arabs are not likely to compromise on. I have, myself, commented on a blog which decried the Senator’s position. Of course McShame takes the same if not stronger position, but Arabs and others in the Middle East expect that. Obama was and is their hope of better relations and fairer hearing for their side of things. I understand intellectually why the Senator may have allowed it to appear that he is more pro-Israeli than he really is. That is not to say that he is not in support of Israel, but simply means he has spoken in a politically expedient way, more forcefully than he might actually think. I’m only defending it to a point of course, I wish all politicians felt they could speak honestly, however, that is simply not the political climate we live in at the moment. Read Ezra Klein’s report.
Here’s a cute little story about the evangelical vote. Seems that McBush isn’t going to get it all, barely most at this point and it may get worse. Here’s what happens when you don’t tow the line in the rightwing wingy world. Obama is certainly not taking the evangelical vote or the Catholic vote as a given loss for him. He is talking to them and is serious. I’m glad to see that many are listening. Thanks to If I Ran the Zoo for the story.
Inside Iraq, offers us one of those perfect little windows into their world. The simple task of making one’s way to work in the morning, and how that is done in Baghdad. It makes you think, it makes you sad, it makes you angry, and in the end, hopefully it makes you determined to elect a better quality person who won’t do this kind of thing because his EGO demands it.
This is a bit out of the ordinary, but it caught my eye. Yes, Virginia, there was a time that it was illegal for two people of different races to marry, and yes, Virginia, one of those places where it was illegal was Virginia. Inside-Out the Beltway has the story about the aptly named case of Loving v. Virginia, decided in 1967. Just a little post to get you thinking, readers.
Poor Mad Kane has broken her wrist and so her limericksare a bit more few and far betweener than usual. We still adore her, wish her well and link you to her latest belabored creation.
It’s that Alzheimer’s moment again for McCain. He is not for, is for privatization of social security? It seems to dependson whether he thinks it helps or hurts his campaign. Gosh but there are now dozens of these changes of heart? for McMac, as he struggles to weave his way through the demographics in some wild fashion that will give him votes. More on this from Think Progress which you can find here.
Well this one has me scratching my head. Well, that’s not unusual, since NRO does that to a normal person anyway. Okay, the story is about science, and how conservatives are “unfairly” labeled as anti-science. No s**t Sherlock? Okay. So he says, most scientists are liberals, and todays work is so internally complex that it’s hard to do experiments to test some things out. Okay. So his answer for conservatives? They should learn more about science so they can do a better job of refuting it! Hurrah! learn more science. Oh, but be careful wingnutties, learn too much and you might, just might start believing it! And of course we can’t have that.
Timothy Eganbreathes a breath of fresh air into the crazy world that has become religiopolitics. He argues that it’s high time that the two go their separate ways again, especially during the election. So far, religious has an embarassing track record in infusing itself into the political arena. Hagee, Parsley, Falwell, and Wright all have contributed negatively. It seems that among some evangelicals, things are changing. Rick Warren and Joel Olsteen are opting out this season. Read this excellent post.
Electronic Intifada gives us a good look at life in the Gaza strip from a Palestinian point of view. It is as always hard for us in the US to understand what it must be like to live like this. We obsess for a few days about our own troubles with flooding. What would it be like to live day in and day out under the conditions described by Nora Barrows-Friedman? Read her report and find out.
Tony Rezko was convicted last week. I don’t know a great deal about the story of his downfall or his now proven illegal behavior. What I do commend him for is for standing for something in the end. He refused to play ball with Federal prosecutors in their unrelenting attempt to get him to implicate either Barack Obama or the state’s governor in any wrongdoing. He flat out says, neither did a darn thing wrong as far as he knows. Of course we are well aware that the Bushbabies have used Justice to their own political devices, this is nothing new. Politico gives up the story.
That deal for permanent bases in Iraq seems stalled. So reports al-Maliki. It seems that what the US, wants, make that Bush wants , is simply untenable from an Iraqi point of view and unfairly impinges upon their sovereignty. Not just impinge by the way, but “hugely” impinges according to the Prime Minister.
Scott Greenwald has a most interesting and important post that is tangential to the one on the Habeas Corpus decision of SCOTUS. He looks at the British and their exercise in attempting to fashion a detention law. It seems that Conservatives there are highly against such a practice. It’s a fascinating look at what might be deemed true conservativism over what Mr. Greenwald calls here, mere authoritarianism. I think it’s worthwhile reading an intelligent explanation of why such tactics are simply beneath civilized countries that claim to be democratic in nature.
Again, this is a bit off the usual topics, but Sheldon Yellen has a really excellent post on marriage and gays. He pushes a lot of buttons, asks a lot of interesting and provocative questions. Just what is being defended here? The question I unceasingly ask. What is it being defended against? How does allowing gays to have the same rights and me, hurt me? But more than that, he just talks about marriage, and slips in a little gem that our soon to be gone boy George has had mostly a negative impact on the institution.
Former campaign treasurer for the GOP, Christopher Ward, has got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He took the GOP for a record $800,000 devoted to paying his mortgage and other home improvements. And yes, the GOP still wishes you to believe that they are more than capable of protecting your tax money. Uhuh, yeah, sure. Thanks to the Washington Independent for this one.
Okay, I plain could not resist the temptation to introduce a bit of levity in the election coverage today. And, well, you know I wouldn’t do so at Obama’s expense, so that leaves old tired Mac. I really couldn’t resist because well, this was just darn funny. Hope you enjoy it. “McCain Announces Run for Presidency.”
Another thoughtful piece from Washington Independent focuses on the use of the word elitism and how it’s being bandied around by McCain and others against Obama. Citing to some interesting remarks from noted historian David McCullough, Sridharr Pappu makes a convincing argument that the story of Obama is the story of the American dream, the stuff our founding fathers and others fought so hard to give us. Nice, nice post.
In case you missed it in all the hoopla about the Habea Corpus decision, Scalia weighed in for the dissenters with a scathing and war/fear-mongering display wherein he actually said that Americans will die for this decision. Vox Nova calls both the so-called Catholics Roberts and Scalia, to task for their uncharitable, unChristian and most unCatholic dissents.
~~~&&&~~~&&&~~~
“We are continually faced with a series of great opportunities brilliantly disguised as insoluble problems.” John W. Gardner
“Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.” Euripides
“Ethics are so annoying. I avoid them on principle.” Darby Conley
“I like persons better than principles, and I like persons with no principles better than anything else in the world.” Oscar Wilde
“A man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can afford to let alone.” Henry David Thoreau
~~~&&&~~~&&&~~~
And the country of Abu Dhabi announced they’re buying the Chrysler Building in New York. They’re buying the Chrysler Building. Hey, why not? The Saudis already own the White House, why not buy the Chrysler Building too? Jay Leno
You can’t eat tomatoes because they’re tainted with deadly salmonella. Yeah, now listen to this. First, of course, we went through tainted lettuce. Now, tainted tomatoes. Who would have thought that the healthiest part of a B.L.T. would be the bacon? Honestly, what is happening? David Letterman
Scientists at KeioUniversity in Japan claim that pigeons are able to discriminate video images of themselves, and can do this better than 3-year-old toddlers. Big deal. Wake me up when they find a pigeon who can be potty-trained better than a 3-year-old. – Paul Seaburn, Spring, Texas
The evolution of medical treatment:
2000 B.C. – Here, eat this root.
1000 A.D. – That root is heathen. Here, say this prayer.
1850 A.D. – That prayer is superstition. Here, drink this potion.
1940 A.D. – That potion is snake oil. Here, swallow this pill.
1985 A.D. – That pill is ineffective. Here, take this antibiotic.
2000 A.D. – That antibiotic is artificial. Here, eat this root.
Well, John McCain just announced he wants to do a series of town hall meetings where he’ll meet with the public. That’s a good idea, yeah. It’s all part of McCain’s “Speak Up, I Can’t Hear You” tour.
NASA has announced plans to send a probe to orbit the sun, where it will have to withstand temperatures of 2,500 degrees Fahrenheit. Yeah. When he heard about it, President Bush said, “Why don’t they just go at night?” Conan O’Brien
President Bush is in Europe right now, on a tour of Germany, Italy, France, England, and several other countries that hate him.
While he’s gone, don’t worry, America is safe and sound in the more competent hands of Barney, the White House terrier.
I guess it’s like a farewell tour for the President before he returns home to kick off his six-month good riddance tour here. Jimmy Kimmel
Filed under: Barack Obama, Catholicism, Church/State, Current Issues, Democrats, Election 2008, Environment, GOP, Gay Rights, Individual Rights, Iraq, John McCain, Limericks, Middle East, SCOTUS, Sociology, Veterans, Voting, racism, religion, science, terrorism | Tagged: Catholicism, Election 2008, evangelicals, gay rights, Gitmo, GOP, habeas corpus, Iraq, John McCain, Limericks, Palestine, racism, religion, science, SCOTUS, sociology, terrorism, Veterans Affairs, voting
























Yes, I expected, too, a bit more coverage of the tornado at the Boy Scout camp. Last evening, during the 9 p.m. Ch. 28 Fox News, they did have a brief story from out there. Otherwise, the only mention has been on the national news.
I’m glad your sump pump is keeping up. In CR…..water, water everywhere, and hardly a drop to drink……it sounds like, anyway.
Sherry,
I happened to tune to Channel 3, KIMT, from Mason City this afternoon……..it comes in fuzzy here, but viewable. They are planning to do a story tonight on their 6 p.m. newscast about the Boy Scout from Eagle Grove who died at the camp. I know you probably can’t get Ch. 3, but their website will have the story, too.
Glad you are not floating yet. As always I enjoy your posts greatly. Now I have my hubby reading you.
My favorite, the evolution of medical treatment!!
Thanks Vicki. We are still not floating. In fact, we may just get some drying time in the next few days. Glad you are enjoying the blog. It does help when folks indicate what they most like. I try to focus of course on things that I think people will enjoy or will want to know.
I love the humor a lot. It makes a nice transition expecially from the serious political stuff! lol.
Jeannelle, I saw some of the stuff on the boy scouts on other cable channels. It was so sad, but boy were they to be commended for how well they were trained to help themselves and each other. I’m sure many parents are very proud of their young boys, as they should be.
Senator Obama is NOT a Dirty Muslim!
“What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge,” says Mr. Obama, while denouncing statements of him being a Muslim as a smear. Why is the presidential candidate who claims to be religiously inclusive is treating the word “Muslim” as an insult? Apparently, it is OK for Mr. Obama to be associated with terrorists like William Ayers or racists like Jeremiah Wright, but God forbid somebody would call him a Muslim! No, he won’t stand for that kind of smear! We admit that most terrorists are Muslims, but most Muslims are not terrorists and the statement on Mr. Obama’s website is insulting to hundreds of millions of people.
How could a man who discards his family heritage in favor of political expediency be even considered for presidency of the United States? Where are all the so-called “Islamic civil rights groups” like CAIR, MPAC, ISNA, MAS, etc. who are quick to defend every Islamic terrorist, but are silent when Muslims in general are being denigrated? Would Mr. Obama have the same reaction if someone claimed that he was raised as a Jew? We sincerely doubt that.
Muslims Against Sharia demand immediate removal of “SMEAR: Barack Obama is a Muslim” statement from the official Barack Obama’s website as well as an apology for giving the word “Muslim” a negative connotation.
http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2008/06/senator-obama-is-not-dirty-muslim.html
ReformIslam:
A couple of points. The site is called “Fight the Smears.” That does not mean that everything is considered a smear. Rather this particular reference that Obama is Muslim is a falsehood, a lie. That in no way means or necessarily suggests that Mr. Obama would be ashamed of being a Muslim.
I do agree that there is some inference that one could draw along these lines. But, it is paramound to remember that we live in a particular climate in this world, one that is sadly permeated with bigotry of all kinds by most people. Mr. Obama is in a race to win the presidency, and frankly many of us think that it is essential that he rather than McCain win this presidency, if only to stop the continuous bloodshed and the deteriorating conditions between us all.
Many in this country, wronngly, in my opinion, would not vote for Senator Obama if they believed that he had Muslim ties. Many did not vote for Mitt Romney solely because of his Mormon connection. This is not right, but is the reality we live in. I can understand why Obama supporters would want to make it very clear in this atmosphere that he is not Muslim, because every vote counts. Many African Americans also believe Obama has not spoken out strongly enough on racial inequalities that still plague us. He again, does not for the same reason. A certain type of voter would be alienated by such rhetoric.
I wish we lived in a world where every politician could state exactly and truthfully how they felt about all manner of issues. I trust, based on what I have seen that Mr. Obama is neither a hater of Muslims nor of any other group of people. I trust that he will do far more to forge a better relationship with all groups around the globe than his opponent.
I thank you for your statement. Saying that I would ask that you speak directly and not simply post in a comment a post from your blog. You may always suggest that I check your post for possible linkage, as I link to dozens of blogs every day. I think it was worth your time to speak directly and not simply drop a cut and paste job. The issue is worth dialogue, not simply posting across one another.
Sherry:
“The site is called “Fight the Smears.” That does not mean that everything is considered a smear. Rather this particular reference that Obama is Muslim is a falsehood, a lie.”
When Obama website states: “SMEAR: Barack Obama is a Muslim” it is hard to consider it anything else. If it said: “FALSEHOOD: Barack Obama is a Muslim”, there wouldn’t be any issues.
“particular climate in this world, one that is sadly permeated with bigotry of all kinds by most people”
That in no way justifies perpetuating bigotry of any kind, especially, by a presidential candidate’s website.
“Mr. Obama is in a race to win the presidency, and frankly many of us think that it is essential that he rather than McCain win this presidency, if only to stop the continuous bloodshed and the deteriorating conditions between us all.”
So, if McCain sucks more than Obama, it is OK for Obama to project bigotry?
“Many in this country, wronngly, in my opinion, would not vote for Senator Obama if they believed that he had Muslim ties.”
We have no problems with Obama denying being a Muslim, especially, considering the fact that he is not. We have a problem with the form in which he is denying it. He is equating the word “Muslim” with something libelous.
“I have seen that Mr. Obama is neither a hater of Muslims nor of any other group of people.”
You’re probably right. He doesn’t insult Muslims because he hates us, he insults us because it is politically expedient. But the end result is the same.
Muslims Against Sharia
Okay, fair enough. I think you mistake my attempting to define the reasons why this occurred and took it as a defense. I do not and will not defend what was said or done. I seek only to explain it. I agree that you are certainly more right than I. You are morally right as well.
I agree that the ends do not justify the means. I guess it comes down to proportionality. The greater harm will occur if Mr. McCain attains the office, so I’m willing to accept this from Obama when I would certainly prefer a clear statement that he finds this kind thing irrational and bigoted.
I am sure that if I were on the receiving end I would feel a bit differently. I can certainly say that I found much of the misogyny regarding the campaing of Senator Clinton much more offensive than did my husband who I considered a very fair, open-minded man. He truly does not see himself as anti-liberated in any fashion, yet we found ourselves in some disagreement during this political season. I am not saying he was right and I was wrong, or vice versa however. We cannot escape our own lenses as it were. And I don’t expect you to either.
So I guess it comes down to the fact that I agree with you intellectually and morally. However, I do see the explanation of this, hard as it may seem in this vicious political climate. Perhaps in the end, he should have made a statement that was clearer. It is probably correct that those who continue to profess that Mr. Obama is a Muslim, are simply determined to use that crutch (as they see it) to mask what they feel is unacceptable but true of them: they dislike him because he is black.
Of course, as in all such bigotry, the real issue is the lack of self-worth exhibited by the people who hold such views.
I hope you continue to dialogue here. Your imput and point of view, and those similarly situated, is essential if we are to bridge the gap that threatens to become a gulf.